beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
The evidence seized shall be confiscated by the defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Judgment of the court below]
1. Defendant A, B, and C, in violation of the Special Act on the Prevention of Telecommunications-based Financial Fraud and Refund of Loss, intended to deposit money into the above passbook by inviting and delivering a passbook to be used in the crime of Bosing Chinese Bosing Organization on its name, and the above Bosing Organization attempted to withdraw the money deposited in the passbook and deliver it to the Chinese Bosing Organization on its name in order to deliver the money by the so-called “Mesing,” “Mesing,” the victim’s act of self-defense, and by threatening the victims to spread the money after recording the form of the victim’s act of self-defense, the so-called “Mesing,” the victim’s act of self-defense, and by misrepresenting the investigative agency, the victim’s electronic financial information, and transfer the money to the above passbook.
Defendant
On February 24, 2015, A, B, and C acquired a passbook in the name of the company bank (K) from Defendant D, and transferred it to the Chinese Bosing Organization. On the same day, the Chinese Bosing Organization in the name of the Chinese Bosing Organization misrepresented L with the name of the victim L, and made L make L deposit of KRW 2.97 million with the above company bank passbook, and M withdrawn the money deposited as above.
Defendant
A, B, C, and D have the victim L enter information or orders in the data processing device, such as computer, etc., for the purpose of telecommunications-based financial fraud as above, from May 1, 2015 to May 1, 2015, and thereafter, from that time, the information or order is given to the data processing device, such as computer, etc., by having 20 victims transfer total sum of KRW 13,277,200,00 for 44 times in total for the purpose of telecommunications-based financial fraud as shown in attached Table (However, Defendant C limited to Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the crime list, and Defendant D limited to No. 1 of each crime list).