Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
However, as to the Defendants for three years from the date of the final conclusion of this judgment, the said judgment is against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] On July 5, 2018, Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act at the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch Branch on July 5, 2018, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 4, 2018.
Defendant
D On December 22, 2017, the Seoul District Court was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on December 30, 2017 due to an indecent act committed by force in the vice branch of the Incheon District Court on December 22, 201, and the said judgment was finalized on December 30, 2017.
[2] The Defendants and I conspired to sell a mobile phone with the victim'sJ with intellectual disability 3 known to Defendant A prior to his example and sell the device by cutting the device back and selling it in installments. The Defendants and I had friendly stay in the Defendant's residence around September 2017, and had Defendant A her cell phone opened a mobile phone with the victim'sJ with intellectual disability 3, which he had been aware of.
On September 13, 2017, according to the above conspiracy, the Defendants demanded the agent to open a phone 7 in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,152,800 to the victim, and requested the victim to change it. However, Defendant B, C, and D kept the site at the second floor of the public parking lot in the business-based city in the business-based city in the city in the city, and Defendant A forced the victim to take care of the face of the victim. After that, the Defendants took back the victim and moved to the Defendant’s residence, the victim was deducted from the victim in front of the Defendant A’s residence in N while moving to the Defendant’s residence.
The Defendants continued to have the victim go through 1,152,80 won at the agency of “P” after the following day after the locking with the victim at the Defendant’s residence, and then cut off the victim 7 from the victim who was in a situation where he cannot make a resistance due to assault in the Defendant A’s residence.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with I to prevent the victim from resisting the victim jointly, and took two cell phoness of the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Written statements by the Prosecutor and the Police against J.