All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the principal office.

In fact, on June 16, 2016, in the vicinity of the defendant's argument located in Kim Jong-si, the defendant injured the plaintiff's head part of the plaintiff A on one time as he she enjoyed a pesticide spraying machine, and damaged the above plaintiff's floor by pushing the plaintiff in both hands and cutting it over to the floor, thereby causing about two weeks of treatment to the above plaintiff.

Plaintiff

A, at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (a) above, was pushed the Defendant by tightly pushing the Defendant, and putting the Defendant’s shoulder with both hands, thereby causing injury to the Defendant, such as the left-hand sloak, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

On June 16, 2016, the Defendant suffered injury from Plaintiff B’s house located in Kim Jong-si on June 16, 2016, and from Plaintiff B’s side gate of Plaintiff B, the Defendant got pressured for approximately 70 days to the said Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] In light of the above-mentioned facts, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, Eul evidence No. 1, and the judgment on the claim of the main lawsuit as to the claim of the entire purport of the pleadings, the defendant's act of inflicting bodily injury upon the plaintiff Gap constitutes a tort. Thus, the defendant is liable for compensation for damages caused to the above plaintiff.

The plaintiff A shall seek the payment of KRW 500,000 from the lost income.

However, the above Plaintiff was 71 years of age who had already exceeded the maximum working age at the time of the instant accident, and there is no other evidence to prove that the said Plaintiff had earned income, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the lost income is rejected.

The consolation money is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff A suffered mental pain due to the defendant's assault, and the defendant has a duty to flag it in money.

In light of the situation and circumstances at the time of violence, the part and degree of injury, the age of the above plaintiff, subsequent circumstances, and all other circumstances revealed in the pleadings of this case, consolation money shall be determined as KRW 1,00,000,000, which the above plaintiff shall be compensated for.