logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.09.10 2020고단913
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 5, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months for embezzlement in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch branch on February 5, 2020 and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 13, 2020.

The defendant of "200 Godan913" is the representative director of corporation C in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si.

On June 14, 2018, the Defendant, at the above C office, was the victim D corporation, as the model of the machine learning center model “SIUS-UL PL PLS, serial number M26715G59B,” and “the machine learning center in this case” under the name of the machine learning center model which is equivalent to the market price of KRW 60 million.

The name of the NC Electric Model S 750 CNC, serial number 201705047, hereinafter referred to as the “NC electric” in this case, which is equivalent to KRW 32 million in the market value.

) In selling the machinery on the same day, a contract was entered into with two or more of the above NC electricals (including model name SG-430CNC, serial number 201405021) to leave three of the machinery from the injured company a siren of KRW 4,704,700 per month.

However, on February 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) resigneded another factory machine from E Co., Ltd. on the same day; and (b) concluded the instant mortgage agreement with the instant machine learning center as collateral; (c) thus, the instant machine learning center became the object of security for transfer; and (d) even if the aforementioned matters were to be notified to the victim company as they were important in the above sales contract with the victim company, the Defendant did not notify the victim company of the conclusion of the above security for transfer; and (c) the instant NC Electric was owned by F Co., Ltd.; and (d) the Defendant was not the owner even if he was the owner of the instant machine, and the Defendant was not the owner of the instant machine, and the instant machine and NC Electric Co., Ltd prepared a sales contract with the victim company as if it were owned by the Defendant.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim company and operates the Defendant on June 15, 2018 from the victim company.

arrow