logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.17 2014고단5597
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who operates a business in the name of "E" in the population D and 3 of the wife population in Young-si, and the defendant A is an employee employed by the defendant B. The defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic in return for money from male who found the above business.

Accordingly, on September 24, 2014, Defendant A received KRW 110,000 from a police officer who was found to be a customer by pretending to be a customer at the above business establishment on September 24, 2014, and directed him as a smuggling, Defendant A entered F, a female of the nationality of Thailand, to have a similar sexual intercourse act.

In addition, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts from September 14, 2014 to September 24, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Each of the Defendants is subject to the punishment of acts of arranging sexual traffic, Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a fine: Defendant B who is selected to impose a fine;

1. Defendant A at a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B who has received an order for probation and education: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize each of the defendants' errors; the period of the crime is not long; Defendant A has no particular criminal records in Korea; Defendant B has no criminal records of the same kind; Defendant B is judged to have a risk of re-offending in light of the Criminal Procedure Code, etc. Meanwhile, in the case of Defendant B, there is no risk of committing a crime; and parts of the crime without considering all the circumstances such as the degree to which the Defendants committed the crime was committed; and sentencing guidelines

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes from the end of July 2014 to September 13, 2014 in the same manner as the facts constituting the offense indicated in the judgment.

2. The Defendant’s judgment from the end of July 2014.

arrow