beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 17,745,00 for Plaintiff A; (b) KRW 6,300,000 for Plaintiff C; and (c) for each of them, from May 22, 2017 to April 2019.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant, as the owner of the E large 235.4 square meters in Pakistan, used the building, which became a prefabricated sand position panel on the above land, as a warehouse for the storage of infants (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) in unregistered state.
B. The Plaintiff A resided in the instant housing, along with the Plaintiff B, as the owner of the Fluter concrete hub roof detached housing (hereinafter “Plaintiff A’s building”) located on the north side of the instant warehouse, and the Plaintiff B, the wife of the instant warehouse.
C. The Plaintiff C resided in the instant house as the owner of G year and Switzerland’s multi-story housing (hereinafter “Plaintiff C’s building”) at the time of Pakistan located on the west of the instant warehouse.
On May 2, 2017, a fire that occurred in the instant warehouse (hereinafter “the instant fire”) around 18:35, was removed from the instant warehouse. Accordingly, Plaintiff A’s building and Plaintiff C’s building were partially damaged.
1. The legal assessment certificate of stability (Evidence 3) and the National Scientific Investigation Agency are likely to extinguish the front left side of the infant uniforms warehouse, and there is a possibility that the fire in this case may have been generated due to electrical causes from the string of light that was installed in the club. 2. The comprehensive report of the metropolitan fire investigation (Evidence 6) and the government fire fighting team fire fighting team fire fighting team: the cause is presumed to have been first generated from the front side of the warehouse - the cause is presumed to have not entered for a long time, and the possibility of fire due to mechanical gas leakage and natural and chemical factors can be denied and excluded. Although the main breaker of the decentralization is observed in the form of a set-off, it cannot be confirmed that the damage of the steel structure was seriously damaged, and that the fire cannot be found directly due to the discovery of the outside cigarette in the front side of the warehouse and the discovery of the fire in the middle side of the container.