beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share 16,004,263 won to the Plaintiff A, and 1,000,000 won to the Plaintiff B, and 500.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) On May 23, 2016, Plaintiff A: (a) crossing the crosswalk at the front G apartment of the Yansan-gu G apartment at the front of the front of the front city of the front city on May 23, 2016, with the width of approximately 14 cm between India and the roadway, and suffered an injury with the upper end of the floor, wherein the left part part of the elbbbbbow was cut and the upper end of the road was cut off (hereinafter “instant accident”).
2) The instant accident site was established and managed by the Defendant Jeonju-si, and the Defendant Limited Company F (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) was under the implementation of the construction of a water pipe and the removal of the water pipe that was contracted from the Defendant Jeonju-si.
3) At the time of the instant accident, the relationship between the Defendant Company’s vehicle and the Defendant Company parked along the crosswalks was somewhat narrow and narrow, and the above infinites were left alone, but no separate accident prevention measure was taken. (iv) Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s spouse, and Plaintiff C and D are their children.
5) Defendant Jeonju-si is the construction manager and manager of the road and the owner of the said construction, and the Defendant Company is jointly responsible for compensating for all damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the instant accident as the contractor of the said construction. The limitation of liability: 15% of the Defendants’ liability ratio (the Defendants’ negligence, failure to drive, failure to drive, and failure to pass the crosswalk in the construction site were to pass the crosswalk unreasonably by putting bicycles on the bicycle. [In the absence of any grounds for recognition, the facts without any grounds for recognition, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 12, Eul’s evidence Nos. 6, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 4, and 10-1 through 5, images, and the results of inquiries
2. Scope of damages.
A. The plaintiffs claim that the plaintiff AH (the remaining 45 years old and 6 months old at the time of the accident) was the daily wage of 130,264 won per day, and the number of working days on 22 days per month.
From September 23, 2019 to October 23, 2035, 193 Mabrid.