logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.05.26 2015고단7478
사기등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a copy of the National Health Insurance Corporation’s certificate of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, who is a private document pertaining to factual relations, by accessing the National Health Insurance Corporation’s Internet homepage and obtaining a written confirmation of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification; (b) using the computer, stating “workplace subscriber”, “B” in the name column of the workplace, and “B” in the column of acquisition of qualification; and (c) sent and exercised the written confirmation of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation, which is a private document related to the facts at the above location, by using the computer.

2. On August 19, 2013, the Defendant filed an application for the issuance of credit cards under the name of the Defendant at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) on August 19, 2013, and sent a written confirmation of the acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification to the staff

As he has worked in the company B, he was working as if he would pay the credit card price properly by issuing the credit card.

However, the Defendant did not work in B at the time, and used 4-5 existing credit cards while living without any particular property or income, and settled the card price in the form of a stoping return, and the credit card was intended to be additionally issued and used because it was difficult to prevent return only with the existing credit card, so even if the credit card was issued, there was no intention or ability to pay the card price properly.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received a modern card (credit card No. C) under the defendant's name on August 25, 2013 from the victim, and then on January 22, 2014, the defendant from around July 22, 2014.

arrow