logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고단8262
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. In using and managing the means of access to electronic financial transactions, no person shall borrow or lend the means of access or keep, deliver or distribute the means of access with the knowledge that such means are to be used for a crime or to be used for a crime, unless otherwise provided for in any other Act;

Nevertheless, on September 2017, the Defendant received a proposal that “I will pay KRW 200,000,000 for each month when I lent the e-mail card, which is a alcoholic beverage company, with too low alcoholic beverage tax in order to set aside alcoholic beverage taxes.”

On September 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was aware of, or was aware of, the fact that the lending of the check would be used for committing a crime, such as tax evasion, telephone financial fraud, etc.; (b) in response to such doubt, around September 27, 2017, the Defendant issued a copy of the check card, which was linked to the DNA bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant at the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, through Kwikset Service Articles, and notified the password.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access to electronic financial transactions while knowing that they will be used for crimes.

2. On October 30, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 2 years of suspended execution by violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) and was aware of the fact that the Defendant was able to borrow a loan, and that he was aware of the fact that he was able to receive and withdraw the amount of damage from the victim using the said DNA bank account as a scaming crime, but he was aware of the fact that the Defendant was able to receive and withdraw the amount of damage from the victim. On September 27, 2017, the Defendant sent the account number of the said DNA bank account to the account holder and sent the password.

Meanwhile, on September 26, 2017, the above person who was dissatisfy in name.

arrow