A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

No credit card merchant shall conduct a transaction by credit cards in the name of another credit card merchant.

Nevertheless, from March 30, 2017 to April 30, 2017, the Defendant calculated 170,000 won by using the credit card merchant name in the name of “G” in the name of “E store” in the name of the non-sicker, and traded by using the credit card store name of “G” from November 8, 2017 from that time to November 8, 2017, the Defendant used the credit card merchant name in the name of the above G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. The written accusation and the written answer;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles 70 and 70 (3) 3 and 19 (5) 3 of the Act, the selection of imprisonment for a financial business specializing in providing credit services and the selection of a punishment for a crime;

1. In light of the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, the number of transactions conducted in the name of another credit card member store for the reason of sentencing is considerably high, and the amount of transactions is also large, there is also need for strict punishment.

However, the revised return is filed and the unpaid value-added tax is paid in installments with permission.

There is no history of the same crime and reflects his mistake.

In consideration of these circumstances, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.