logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.08.17 2015고정188
업무방해
Text

Defendant

B The Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000, and a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2015 High 188,” was aware of the fact that Defendant B would go through the private land of the victim E in order for the victim E to go to the Y and G (hereinafter “victim E-owned land”) while residing in Chungcheong City D, and the victim E would interfere with the work of the victims by carrying the 15 tons dump truck in order to enter the land owned by the victim E and blocking the front side of the access road to the defective passenger-owned land.

1. From November 20, 2014 to October 10, 2014, Defendant B interfered with the Plaintiff’s farming business of the victim E by force and interfered with the Plaintiff’s work of transporting matos and driving of cars on the roads passing through the Chungcheongnam-siJ from around 09:00 to around 10:00 (hereinafter “road”) (the above roads and the roads connected thereto are referred to as “the roads of this case”). In order to open earth, Defendant B, by carrying 15 tons of soil on 15 tons of truck and intending to enter the land owned by the victim E, thereby blocking the victim’s 15 tons of truck from entering the land.

2. On December 4, 2014, Defendant B committed the crime: (a) around December 10, 2014, to from around 10:00 to around 11:00, Defendant B obstructed the victim’s farming business by blocking the entry of the victim E by placing 15 tons of 15 tons of matop truck onto the land owned by the victim E and blocking the victim’s 15 tons of matop truck from having access to the land owned by the victim, thereby blocking the victim’s farming business by force; (b) at the same time, the victim I interfere with the victim’s mato transport and the operation of vehicles.

Defendant B and Defendant A, “2015 High 193, 193,” and the Defendants, together with fruit farming houses, distributed profits, the victim E, while distributing profits.

arrow