1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and sells the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant of the plant.

The Plaintiff has continued to conduct a transaction from around January 2007 to around January 2013, even after the Defendant closed his/her business with the Defendant, closed his/her business and changed his/her business name with the name of his/her business operator C, D, etc. in his/her name.

B. Around March 2009, the Defendant delivered each of the instant checks and promissory notes (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant checks, etc.”) to the Plaintiff.

The number of units (F) 14,685,00 of the number of units (G) 14,685,000 of the number of units (G) 2.7.15, 200 of the number of units (G) 15,370,000 of the number of units (G) 3, 209 July 6, 2009, large-type Co., Ltd. (H) 15,675,000 of promissorysory notes (H) 15,675,00 on May 20, 209, the date of issuance of the 12.13.209, the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of the number of units (E) 1, 2, 3-1 through 3, 5 through 7, 10, 100 of the number of units, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the evidence set forth in subparagraphs 1 through 1, 10 of the pleading.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The plaintiff received each of the of the checks of this case from the defendant at the request of the defendant for the discount of each of the checks of this case and lent each of the face value to the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff a loan equivalent to the face value of each of the checks of this case and interest in arrears. 2) The defendant lent each of the checks of this case to the plaintiff as necessary for financing business funds, and there was no fact that the plaintiff borrowed the amount equivalent to the face value from the plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s delivery of each of the instant checks to the Plaintiff is without dispute between the parties, and according to the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3-1 through 3, 11, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the face value of each of the instant checks, etc. shall be paid.