1. Defendant B’s KRW 526,670 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 19, 2016 to August 30, 2016.

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the Plaintiff’s de facto spouse D lent a total of KRW 36,240,000 to Defendant B several times from January 16, 2008 to August 18, 2008, and Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan debt amount of KRW 5,00,000 among Defendant B’s above loan debt.

B. Defendant B’s assertion from July 24, 2007 to May 9, 2008, borrowed total of KRW 7,360,000 from the Plaintiff’s side, but all of which were repaid, the Defendants’ loan and deposit were extinguished.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. In full view of the facts that there is no dispute between the parties to the loan amount and the guaranteed amount, and the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements No. 2-1 and No. 2-2, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that from July 24, 2007 to May 9, 2008, the Plaintiff lent KRW 7,860,000 to the Defendant B as listed in the following table (in this case, the obligation of borrowing money is specified by the sequence), and the Defendant C guarantees the obligation of borrowing money No. 4 as listed in the table below.

According to the facts that there is no dispute over KRW 1,500,000 on July 24, 2007 with the maturity date for payment of the debt, and there is no dispute over KRW 230,000 on September 13, 2007, and there is no dispute over KRW 20,000 on October 26, 2007, and there is no dispute over KRW 1,500,000 on January 16, 2008, KRW 200,000 on March 16, 2008, KRW 25,000,000 on March 17, 2008, there is no dispute over KRW 60,000,000 on May 20, 2008, KRW 30,000,000 on loan, the Plaintiff’s joint and several surety’s debt guaranteed by the Defendant C cannot be viewed as having separately asserted the loan amount of KRW 30,000,7000.