1. Defendant B’s KRW 78 million and its relation to the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 25, 2013 to June 22, 2017.

1. Claim against the defendant B

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(However, the creditor is considered as the "Plaintiff", and the debtor is considered as the "defendant".

Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by service by public notice)

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C with Defendant C also from March 16, 2013 to the same year.

4. The defendant C loaned approximately KRW 78 million over about 10 times by 30.3, or the defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation of the defendant B.

However, the documents submitted by the Plaintiff alone lent the above KRW 78 million to Defendant C.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since it is difficult to recognize that defendant C had jointly and severally guaranteed the obligation to borrow money from the plaintiff of defendant C.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant C is dismissed as it is without merit.