Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) around 05:00 on August 11, 2015, when they passed a road front of the main point of “E” located in “E” in “E” at the Gongju-si, G (41 tax) at the time of F, the Defendants raised the victim’s speech and behavior that “I am off.” while speaking the victim, “I am off.”, and “I am w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w fight each other in response to the victim’s fighting.”

Accordingly, when Defendant B took part of the victim's face at a number of times due to drinking, Defendant B took part in the victim's face once, and Defendant A took part in the victim's face once a week, and again took part in the victim's face.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. On August 11, 2015, at the same place as around 05:20 on August 11, 2015, Defendant A’s interference with Defendant A’s performance of official duties, and upon receipt of a report from Defendant 1, a police officer of the Gongju Police Station, a police officer of the Gongju Police Station, called for fighting, asked Defendant 1 about his personal information and the circumstances of the instant case, whether or not Defendant 1’s interference with the investigation;

What is the inside of the Republic of Korea is why the identity should be clarified.

“Along with the fact that a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the suppression, investigation, etc. of a crime was threatened as he/she flicks flicks, flicks flicks flicks, flicks flicks flicks I with left hand, and flicks flicks flicks I with the left hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Statement made by the witness I in the third public trial protocol;

1. Entry of each part of the witness J and G in the third public trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers against the defendant A;

1. The police officer’s performance of duties was not legitimate in relation to each on-site photo, patrol boom images, and field CCTV images (Defendant A’s interference with the performance of official duties)

However, the police officer I called out after receiving a report of violence at the time is the defendant A from the victim G.