1. Defendant C’s KRW 5,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from June 4, 2013 to January 24, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 4, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) applied to Defendant C’s dental clinic located in Gumi-si (hereinafter “Defendant Cental”); (b) received an extraction procedure from Defendant C for the left-hand Haak 3 Daegu (hereinafter “instant love”).

(hereinafter “the first procedure of this case”). B.

On June 11, 2013, the Plaintiff began to appeal for more than a sense of the left side by visiting the Defendant C Dental, and, on four occasions until December 28, 2013, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant C D Dental and appealed for the “sleeping the left side,” and the “sleeping the road map” when drinking hot foods, and Defendant C recommended all of them to be a university hospital on December 28, 2013.

C. On April 22, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms that “the perception of the left part after the first procedure of the instant case was deteriorated,” and that “it was satisfying in the course of satisfying, and the satisfying of the satisfy,” which was conducted by the annual household of the Defendant Educational Foundation (hereinafter “the Defendant’s annual household”) and operated by the Defendant’s annual household department (hereinafter “the Defendant’s annual household”).” The Plaintiff was explained as follows: (a) electric satfy, CT photographing, and a simple satfy, etc.; (b) the remainder of the Green in the instant case was confirmed in the CT image; and (c) the left part of the lower part of this case, which is adjacent to this satfy, shall not be the cause of symptoms; and (d) undergo the oral surgery.”

After September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff performed the medication five times through the verification of the state and the inspection, etc. on the basis of the inside of the mouth. On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff stated that “When the symptoms have been more relaxed than the previous one, it is similar for the Plaintiff to sarbly sarn the pain when eating hot foods on the road map or on the road map.”

On June 25, 2014, the Plaintiff received treatment from Defendant B on the part of Defendant B outside the mouth of the Madern Hospital on June 25, 2014, according to the cooperation with the foregoing mouth. The Plaintiff’s treatment is not a cause, and the risk at the time of the removal of the remaining fright is overcoming, and thus, it is inevitable to eliminate the value of the Plaintiff, such as the opinion of dump.