logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.03.10 2016가단27634
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The land listed in paragraph 1 of the Attached List is owned by the Republic of Korea, the land listed in Section 234 of the Attached List is owned by the Plaintiff, and the land listed in Section 5 of the Attached List is owned by C.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) when one of the above lands is set aside, b. according to the sequence listed in the separate sheet.

The instant land No. 234 was originally owned by the Republic of Korea and D. ① As to the portion of the instant land No. 2, 482/635, which was the name of the Republic of Korea, on September 23, 2015, the ownership transfer registration was completed as to the portion of the Plaintiff’s 153/635, which was the Plaintiff’s name, on August 27, 2015, on June 29, 2016, on May 25, 2016. ② Of the land No. 34, on February 11, 2016, the ownership transfer registration was completed as to the portion of the Plaintiff’s 482/635, which was the name of the Republic of Korea among the land No. 34, on January 14, 2016, on June 25, 2016.

C. ① On the ground of the part “B” in the attached Form No. 1 among the land in this case, a plastic house is installed, and a toilet is installed on the ground of the part “B” and the part “b” part 10 square meters on the ground of the part “10 square meters.” ② On the ground of the part “A” in the attached Form No. 13 among the land in this case, the building is installed on the ground of the 38 square meters, and the entrance protection facility is installed on the 16 square meters in the part “C” and the part “D” part on the 111 square meters in the ground, respectively, and ③ among the land in this case, a plastic house is installed on the 90 square meters in the part “S”

(hereinafter) The above eavesd greenhouse toilet building entrance and exit shelter facilities are “the instant building, etc.,” and the instant building, etc. are not all unregistered).

The plaintiff was above B.

The District Court against D, as described in subsection 234, acquired shares of co-ownership in the name of the Republic of Korea among the land of this case.

arrow