A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 9. 12. 08:03 경 대구 달성군 B, ‘C’ 앞길에서 아파트 공사 소음 등에 대한 불만을 품고 D 포터 화물차를 공사장 입구에 세우고 공사 관계자들을 상대로 항의를 하던 중, 마침 그 앞으로 차량을 운전하던 중인 피해자 E로부터 ‘ 차를 똑바로 대라’ 라는 말을 듣고 이에 화가 나서 위 화물차를 운전하여 피해자의 차량 앞을 가로막고, 주먹으로 피해자의 목 부분과 얼굴 부분을 수회 때리고, 발로 피해자의 가슴과 엉덩이를 수회 걷어찼다.

Defendant continued to use a small erobbbial eros (30cm in length and 15cm in length on the day) for the first time, which is a dangerous object that had been kept after the driver's seat of the above cargo, and threatened the victim with “the death only” by taking the driver's seat locking with the driver's seat of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the frame of the main part of the left-hand 42 days of treatment, and the frame of the main part of the main part, and the structural part of the main part, and threatened the victim by carrying dangerous things.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Criminal tools, vehicles to board the perpetrator, photographs of the parties, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 257(1), 284, and 283(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1) of the Confiscation Criminal Act is as follows: (a) background leading to the instant crime; (b) background leading up to the occurrence of the instant crime; and (c) background leading up to the threat of the victim’s boomed to a small scale boomed by driving away the victim after the assault; and (d) the victim’s degree of injury was not good in light of the nature of the crime; (b) the damage recovery was not proper; and (c) the victim was the victim.