1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim against the above revocation shall be dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing vessel and components, and the Defendant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing vessel equipment and steel structure.

B. On July 28, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the Defendant on shipbuilding block assembly works that the Defendant contracted from Hyundai Smi Line Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant contract”) and suspended its work around November 18, 2014, while engaging in the production of block under the instant contract from around that time.

C. In addition to the instant contract, the Plaintiff agreed with the Defendant on August 12, 2014 regarding the production of blocks working under the instant contract with respect to the production of blocks, the Plaintiff agreed to be paid all the wage and expendable expenses required for the work until September 30, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant agreement”). D.

In addition, on October 28, 2014, the Plaintiff shall pay in full all the costs of the employee’s wages, expendable goods, and other expenses incurred by the Plaintiff (Defendant) in October 28, 2014.

amount of KRW 79,000,000 incurred previously

9. The consent to the disposal in Section B of the Agreement until 30.30. However, all blocks working in Section B of the Agreement shall run without interruptions to the HMD process schedule.

“A written request for payment of the content and received a fixed date after obtaining the Defendant’s seal;

(hereinafter referred to as “instant request for payment”). (e)

With respect to the instant contract, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice (related to August) dated 29, 2014, which was KRW 197,274,00 (including value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply), which was the tax invoice (related to September), 176,00,000, which was September 30, 2014 (related to September), and the tax invoice (related to September), 108,828,63, 63, which was the tax invoice (related to October), 25, 2014, and delivered it to the Defendant on November 25, 2014 (related to the settlement of accounts as of November 25, 2014), and the Defendant issued a tax invoice (related to the settlement of accounts as of November 539,654,83 won), respectively, for the financial purpose of October 20, 2010 (related to September 8, 2010).