1. Defendant D’s 30,880,970 won and each of the above amounts to Plaintiff A and Defendant D’s 48,821,460 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 3, 2014, at around 16:15, Defendant D driven a F Poter Cargo Vehicle (hereinafter “instant cargo vehicle”) and proceeding from the door to the after door of the three-distance road located in the original city level at the front city level, Defendant D, without examining whether or not a vehicle exists on the front side and left the left from the green light at the front part of H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H Hh Hah-wheeling vehicle (hereinafter “this case’s two-wheeled vehicle”), which was driven by Defendant E, who was driven behind the instant two-wheeled vehicle, going beyond the direction to avoid the said accident, led Defendant E to a combination, which was driven by Defendant E, who was going beyond the direction to avoid the accident (hereinafter “first accident”).

(hereinafter “instant secondary accident”). B.

Due to each accident of this case, G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) died from severe cerebral injury at the site of the accident, and the Plaintiff A inherited the deceased as his spouse, Plaintiff B, and C’s children.

C. Meanwhile, on September 2, 2009, the Deceased entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with Defendant Hyundai Sea (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) with the content of paying KRW 20,000,000 as the deceased, the legal heir of the beneficiary of death, the legal heir of the beneficiary of death, the death of the bodily injury, and the general injury death security (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) between September 2, 200 and September 2, 2080.

(Ground for recognition: Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against defendant D

A. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, Defendant D did not look at the left or left-hand turn at the front section of the non-protective section and caused each of the accidents of this case by negligence, which caused the left-hand turn.