beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A 109,94,161 won, the plaintiff B 106,94,161 won, the plaintiff C 1,00,000 won, and each of them.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Fact 1) D is a metropolitan bus around 19:49 on May 2, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
) A person driving his/her vehicle, driving his/her vehicle, and driving his/her vehicle at approximately 56.25 to 57.6km (hereinafter referred to as 60km per hour at the speed of 56.25 to 57.6km (hereinafter referred to as 60km at the speed of speed) along the same airport in front of the same airport in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul. D used a stop signal and pedestrian signal up to 8-9 meters prior to the stop line of the crosswalk in front of the same school, while waiting in front of the stop line of another vehicle, it is anticipated that it will be immediately changed to the moving signal in light of the usual experience, while driving without reducing a speed at a speed, and the vehicle signal was changed to the stop signal prior to the entry of the crosswalk, resulting in damage to the deceased by negligence in driving the vehicle on the right side of the crosswalk and driving the vehicle on the left side of the front side of the crosswalk as it was without examining whether there was a person who had already entered the crosswalk due to the stop signal.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Plaintiff A and B are the parents of the Deceased, and the Plaintiff C is the birth of the Deceased. [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, the entry of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 6 (including the serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the entire pleadings.
B. According to the above findings of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident of this case.
C. The Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s exemption was entirely caused by the negligence of the Deceased, who is the bicycle driver, and any negligence on the part of the Defendant D, who is the Defendant’s driver.