logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.08.16 2018고단742
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 2017, Defendants A, B, and C conspired to operate the “I” point located in the north-gu Ha at the end of the port of call, and Defendant A provided funding to female employees, such as paying cash, and Defendant B provided overall management of female employees and businesses at the above main point, and Defendant C operated the said main point with Defendant B, who provided the said main point with the Marsh of the said main point.

The Defendants, according to the aforementioned public offering from July 31, 2017 to September 14, 2017, caused female employees to engage in sexual intercourse, such as having them receive KRW 150,00 won at the time of settlement of cash and KRW 170,00 won at the time of settlement of cash under the name of the main agent in which the price for sexual intercourse is included from male customers who found the above main points.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as a broker for commercial sex acts.

2. Defendants A and B conspired to operate the “M” main points in the north-gu L at the end of September 2017 at the port of port around the end of September, 2017. Defendants A and B agreed to operate the said main points while performing the role of comprehensively managing female employees and their businesses at the above main points.

In accordance with the above public offering, the Defendant: (a) had female employees, etc. using the name of “N” from September 29, 2017 to October 2017, and (b) had them engage in commercial sex acts, such as having them receive KRW 150,00 won at the time of cash settlement, and KRW 170,000 at the time of credit card settlement, under the pretext of cash payment, including the price for commercial sex acts, from male customers who found the above main points.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

arrow