logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2014.05.30 2014고정31
향토예비군설치법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for the training of homeland reserve forces in the name of the second unit commander of the 5312 unit unit in the Army, which was conducted at the 2nd unit office located within the territorial sea area of the 121 military forces, the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

2. On November 13, 2013, at around 16:30, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for the training of homeland reserve forces under the name of the second unit commander of the 5312 unit commander of the Army, which was conducted at the training site in the field of the reserve forces located in the area of the 121th territorial sea, the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 312 unit commander of the Army, which was conducted at the training site in the area of the 2nd unit of the 31st unit of the 31st unit of the 2013.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

3. On November 13, 2013, at around 16:30, the Defendant received a notice of call-up for training of homeland reserve forces in the name of the second unit commander of the 5312 unit unit in the Army, which was conducted at the training site in the field of the reserve forces located in the area of the 2nd territorial sea, the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 unit of the Army, which was conducted at the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2013 main unit of the 3nd unit of the 312nd unit of the

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement to the effect that “The defendant was given a notice of call for training of the reserve forces as stated in the facts charged, but did not participate in the training.”

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written charge, written confirmation of the sender of the training call notice, a copy of the receipt of the training call notice, and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes, and Articles 15 (9) 1 and 6 (1) of the Establishment of Homeland Reserve Forces Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow