beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment for eight months.
However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A is a person who was the chairperson of E to take charge of the selection, assignment, management, and supervision of D adjudication at the Federation of C, an incorporated association, around February 2008 to December 2, 201, and Defendant B was the former chairperson of the above E at the Franchis Association from January 201 to December 2014. Since Defendant A, as the chairperson of each party, exercises the final and conclusive authority to select, re-election, assign, assign, and notify the above Committee’s overall affairs, taking overall charge of the foregoing Committee’s affairs, and exercises the final and conclusive authority. As such, Defendant A, as the chairperson of each party, exercised the authority of selecting, re-appointing, allocating, and allocating the adjudication, etc. in a fair and objective manner, and had the duty to manage and supervise the adjudications belonging to C so that trust and reputation of C can be maintained well across and outside the country by operating the games fairly.
F was a person who was a DNA ruling of the Franchis Association from around 2006 to around 2014, and G was a person who was a dub of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”) affiliated D (hereinafter referred to as “H”).
2. On June 26, 2009, Defendant A received KRW 500,000 from the F of the Judgment Committee affiliated with the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the Financial Services Commission to the Defendant’s national bank account under the pretext of an illegal solicitation to the effect that “The F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the F of the Financial Services Commission may be re-appointed to the Defendant A’s national bank account.”
Accordingly, Defendant A was a person who manages another’s business and acquired property in exchange for an illegal solicitation regarding his duties as above.
3. Defendant B
A. On January 2013, Defendant B, within the F’s vehicle located in the “J cafeteria” parking site located in the Busan District, Busan District Court I, Defendant B, in breach of trust, can be re-appointed from F for a trial and receive a large amount of allowances before departure.