logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2019.01.16 2018고정134
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months for fraud in the Suwon District Court Ansan branch on May 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

Around March 30, 2014, the Defendant stated that “C” located in Ansan-si Member B of the Dong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government that “A has to appoint an attorney-at-law due to traffic accidents and there is insufficient money for children to appoint an attorney-at-law. The Defendant paid a full-time payment of KRW 4 million to the Plaintiff.”

After that, the Defendant continued to lend money to the victim on a multiple occasions, such as “a request to lend money due to lack of hospital expenses, and a fine of two million won has been paid due to a drunk driving,” and “a request to lend money.”

However, the Defendant did not have any specific income or property due to the absence of a certain occupation at the time, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, thereby causing the victim to bring about KRW 4 million on March 30, 2014, and the same year.

4. 4. 4 million won, and the same year.

4. 29.2 million won, and the same year.

5. 13.2 million won, and the same year.

5. 22.2 million won, and the same year;

6.3.3 million won, and the same year;

6. On June 3 million won and May 14, 2015, KRW 1500,000,000 were transferred to the E bank account (F) in the name of the defendant, and the sum of KRW 21,50,000 was acquired through deception eight times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (the purport that he/she has received money, such as the market);

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A copy of the bankbook, a statement of transactions, and a statement of accounts transfers to A;

1. Text messages sent to A;

1. A previous conviction in the judgment: Criminal history records, etc., the defendant of the judgment (which was supported by the court below 2012No. 1469) claimed that the victim D did not have made any false statement about the pretext of lending money, and that the defendant had the intent and ability to repay money.

In this case, Dop, Dop.

arrow