logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.03.09 2016고단819
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 12, 2013, the Defendant stated that “Around the construction site located in Yangsan-si, the Defendant would make a false statement to the Victim C, stating that “I will make a repayment immediately as I will make a payment for the capital of KRW 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 3,000,000,000,000,000,000 won and KRW 1,000,000,000,000,00

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the money to the victim even if he received construction payment from another construction site because there are a large amount of wages to the people at the time.

As above, the Defendant, as well as by deceiving the victim and being granted KRW 2 million for the same day as the borrowed money, obtained the delivery of KRW 2 million on May 14, 2013, KRW 12,000,000 on May 20, 2013, KRW 350,000 on June 4, 2013, KRW 18,3550,000,000 on June 9, 2013.

"2016 Highest 1351"

1. On February 22, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant made a false call to the victim D, stating that “The Defendant was given a contract for school construction work from the friendship-gu that did not receive the payment by paying the payment by cash, and was removed from part of the construction work, and if the Defendant did not introduce the construction work, he/she would immediately pay the payment.”

However, the defendant did not have been awarded a contract for school construction work, and there was no intention or ability to pay money to the victim because there was a lot of wages distributed to the father at the time.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 3 million, including KRW 3 million, KRW 3 million, KRW 3 million, and KRW 3 million, around March 2, 2013, KRW 19:00,000 from the Defendant’s birth on the same day.

2. On July 2013, the Defendant called the victim’s phone at a closed site in the end of the end of the end of the year, stating that “If the Defendant received a contract for brick construction work at the studio construction site located in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, the Defendant would later pay the son’s wages in lieu of the son’s wage, and if the son paid the son’s wages instead of the son’s wages.”

arrow