1. Defendant B:

(a) an indication of the attached drawing that is linked to the ground level of 1,507 square meters in Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 2, 2007, the Plaintiff, including the relation to land ownership, purchased from Dong field 1,507 square meters and F field 714 square meters (hereinafter “F land”). At the time, the Plaintiff borrowed money from G to pay part of the purchase price, and completed provisional registration on November 9, 2007 under the name of G.

On June 5, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Plaintiff with respect to each of the above lands.

On July 12, 2006, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) on July 12, 2006 with respect to H farm site 1,319 square meters in the G farm site in the Gyeongbuk-gun, Youngbuk-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Defendant C”), and the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Defendant B on August 29, 2006 (the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Defendant on August 29, 2006, and the area of H farm site was eventually 1,554 square meters in the size of H farm site in the end on December 13, 206, and after the merger, the ownership transfer registration was completed in the name of Defendant B on July 23, 2008 (hereinafter “J land”).

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff and the Defendant maintained a de facto marital relationship from the beginning of the early 2000s, and around 2012, the Plaintiff filed a claim for consolation money and the claim for division of property (hereinafter “related lawsuit”). On September 4, 2012, the said lawsuit was concluded as mediation, including that “the Defendant (the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) is the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Plaintiff) in a related lawsuit) pays KRW 73,188,00 as a division of property to the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff). The active property in the name of the Plaintiff is determined as owned by the Plaintiff, the active property in the name of the Defendant is determined as owned by the Defendant, and the obligation in the name of the Plaintiff is owed by the Plaintiff, and the obligation in the name of the Defendant is repaid by the Defendant.”

The plaintiff and the defendant submitted their respective list of property to review the division of property in the process of the relevant lawsuit, and the part relating to this case in its contents is as follows.