Text
1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) C are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit;
Reasons
A principal lawsuit or counterclaim shall be deemed to be a same.
1. Basic facts
A. On January 5, 2012, the Plaintiff and Defendant C drafted a construction contract for the construction of a new factory building (Evidence No. 1) with respect to the Plaintiff on January 5, 2012. The content of the contract was divided into: (a) Defendant C and the other party to the contract as the Plaintiff; (b) Defendant B’s elderly E (the E field E, the 1600 square meters, the F 1127 square meters, the 190 square meters, and the 190 square meters, the same Ri field as the 100 square meters, and the G 992 square meters, etc. as of February 3, 2012.
(2) On the ground, the construction period is from January 5, 2012 to March 10, 2012; construction cost is KRW 163,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) and a reinforced concrete building factory is newly constructed. (2) After that, the construction period is approved as of April 6, 2012 for the manufacturing business of the general steel structure, sand site location plate, and 390 square meters of the general steel structure, which was constructed on the D ground of the Gyeongbuk-gun-gun, which was later divided, as of April 6, 2012. As to the above building, the registration of preservation of ownership under the name of the Defendant B was completed as of May 31, 2012 by the receipt registration office of the vice branch branch of the Daegu District Court of the Daegu District Court of Justice
(hereinafter referred to as “D’s building”). (b)
B around January 2012, H purchased a 992m2 G G field, Defendant B and Defendant B, and Defendant B entered into an agreement between Defendant B and Defendant B to complete registration of ownership preservation in the name of H by constructing a factory building on the ground of the above land. (ii) H applied for a loan to the Daegu Bank in order to prepare the above purchase price, and the said bank required a written contract for the construction of the above building for the loan. On January 2012, H entered into a standard contract for the construction of the said building with the ordering authority as to the construction of the said building with the Plaintiff and the said building, the Plaintiff, the other party to the contract, the construction cost, the construction cost, and the value-added tax (including value-added tax).
3) On April 13, 2012, Defendant B completed the registration of transfer of ownership of the said land and the registration of preservation of ownership of the said building (hereinafter referred to as “G’s building”).
(b)..