logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2013.07.19 2013고단466
강제추행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant and the victim B (year 23, female) in the instant facts charged are the same between the same company and the same company.

At around 23:30 on January 30, 2013, the Defendant saw the victim to drink the alcohol at his own house more, and took the victim into his own residence with Echeon-si C Apartment 202 Dong 1103, E.C. 202, one of which is his own residence, and led the victim to a sofac, by cutting down the victim who facing and emitted from the toilet and cutting down the facing, and facing it into a sofac, and facing the fac, he facing the fac, and facing the fac, and facing the fac, fa

2. The instant facts charged constitute Article 298 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 11731, Apr. 5, 2013) and Article 306 of the same Act, which can be prosecuted only when a victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 306 of the same Act. According to the records, the victim can be recognized as having submitted a written withdrawal of a complaint to this court on March 14, 2013, which was after the institution of the instant case. Thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act and is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow