Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Churd vehicle.

On May 14, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:30 on May 14, 2016, and led the Defendant to drive the above vehicle on the pedestrian crossing 2260 South Switzerland, Seocheon-ro, Chuncheon, in order to turn it over to the right side of the distance of intention from the bank of the residents center in the leaving-dong.

At all times, traffic control is carried out because signal lights are installed, so a person engaged in driving service shall be slowly carried out, and there was a duty of care to drive according to the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded against the signal and sustained a part of the bicycle side of the victim D (six years of age, south) who passed the crosswalk to the pedestrian signal on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, shacked the bicycle side of the victim D (six years of age, south) who passed the crosswalk to the pedestrian signal in the direction of the defendant’s vehicle, thereby incurring about two weeks of treatment period to the victim D, such as the bridge and other details of unknown parts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of traffic accidents and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no violation of the signal by the defendant, but this court asserted that there was no violation of the signal by the defendant, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged in addition to the overall purport of the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court, i.e., the police officer called "E, a police officer called at the time, was present at this court as a witness and stated in this court that "E, a police officer, was present at the time when two seconds leave in the state of green, that the defendant was suffering from the accident," and the objective reasonableness of the above statement, status of E, etc.