beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From May 2018, the Defendant posted an advertisement on the following contents: (a) from around May 2018, the Defendant entered EID “F” and “G” in the Defendant’s SNS including C and D; and (b) posted an advertisement stating “the purchase of the acquired mobile phone.”
1. On April 18, 2018, at around 18:30, the Defendant purchased KRW 50,00,00 with knowledge of the fact that the 1st day of the non-victimed victim’s possession, which he stolen from H, was a stolen property, from the front of the sublim of Michuhol-gu Incheon, Michuhol-gu, Incheon.
2. Around 12:00 on May 26, 2018, the Defendant purchased 80,000 won with knowledge of the fact that it is a stolen part of the gallon 8 smartphone 1 cost, which the Defendant acquired from I, in front of the main gallon road in Mangal-ro, Mangal-ro, Mangal-ro, Mangal-ro, 1432.
3. On May 28, 2018, at around 19:50, the Defendant purchased in KRW 90,00,00 with knowledge of the fact that the cost of gallon jus juscop 8 smartphone 1, which the Defendant acquired from J, in front of the 2260 Southern river basin, is a stolen property.
4. At around 12:00 on May 30, 2018, the Defendant purchased 70,000 won with knowledge of the fact that the cost of gallon gallon jus 8 smartphone 1, which he acquired from K, was a stolen property in front of the exit of the Gu office located in the Gwangjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangjin-gu.
5. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant purchased from L in front of the exit of 337 Han-gu, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, 31:20, a 337 Han-gu, Jin-si, and purchased at KRW 1.50,00,00 with knowledge of the fact that the gallon judo 9 smartphone 1 cost is a stolen property.
6. Around 18:00 on June 8, 2018, the Defendant purchased at KRW 80,00,000, even though he/she knew that the gallon ju City jumop 8 smartphone 1 cost he/she acquired from M was a stolen property.
7. On June 8, 2018, the Defendant purchased at KRW 100,00,00,00, even though he/she knew of the fact that the gallon 8 smartphone 1 cost, which he/she acquired from N, is a stolen property, in front of the 924 Suwon Station, as he/she had been in front of the 924 Suwon Station.
Accordingly, the defendant market price over seven times.