The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor and six months, and additional collection), the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant's decision on the assertion of unfair sentencing is divided in depth into and reflects his fault, and actively cooperates in the investigation of a drug offender.

However, each of the crimes of this case was purchased from E, etc. by the Defendant, and sold or arranged to sell or sell philophones to C, G, etc., and administered philophones acquired in return for sale and purchase, on two occasions with H, a woman living together. The Defendant was not only engaged in the act of selling or arranging philophones over 15 times, but also engaged in the act of selling or arranging the clophones, and the nature of the crime is not good. The Defendant was punished eight times in total by imprisonment with prison labor, fines one time, imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, and six times in prison for the same crime. The Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case was not good before and after the crime was committed by the Seoul Central District Court on September 1, 201, and the Defendant did not need to be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the violation of the Act on the Control of Psychotropic Drugs and thus, the Defendant did not have any other reason to enforce the punishment of this case.

B. The judgment of the court below on the collection amount ex officio is based on the control of narcotics.