The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)

A. misunderstanding of facts (the part concerning the crime of bodily injury and assault in the case of 2013Hun-Ba637) 1) The Defendant was injured, but there was no fact that the Defendant was flabing the flab of the victim D’s flab, and then was flabed. Rather, the Defendant was flabed from the victim D, and the Defendant was flabing the Defendant’s flab by combining the victim F with the victim D at the time of the instant case, and there was no fact that the Defendant used the victim F to assault the victim F.

B. The sentence of imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 1) 상해의 점에 대하여 살피건대, 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사실 및 사정들을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 피해자 D을 바닥에 넘어뜨린 뒤 주먹으로 얼굴을 때린 사실을 인정할 수 있으므로, 피고인의 이 부분 사실오인 주장은 받아들이지 아니하다. 가) 피해자 D은 피고인이 술을 마시던 중 목을 만지면서 토하는 시늉을 하자 화장실이 밖에 있으니 나가서 토를 하라고 권유하였고, 이에 피고인이 욕설을 하면서 멱살을 잡아 넘어뜨리고 주먹으로 자신의 얼굴을 때렸다고 비교적 구체적으로 진술하였고(증거기록 8쪽), 피해자 D이 특별히 허위 진술을 할 이유는 없는 것으로 보인다.

B) On the contrary, there are diagnosis documents (Evidence No. 13 pages) and photographs (Evidence No. 27 pages) in which the above victim’s statement and degree of injury coincide with each other, and on the contrary, the Defendant stated that ① at the time of the police investigation, “at the time of the police investigation, he was frightened with fright, and was snicked several times, but did not snick up to the floor,” (Evidence No. 61 pages), and ② at the lower court, he was a restaurant operator and a snick in the neighboring restaurant where he was fright and frighted.