beta
Text
1. The defendant is paid KRW 818,700,000 from the plaintiff corporation A, and at the same time he is paid to the plaintiff corporation A.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Seoul Gangnam-gu and 2 lots of ground B-building (hereinafter “instant tenement house”) were composed of 1 and 8 households, and was approved on February 4, 1980.
B. Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of donation made on May 29, 2014, with respect to the instant tenement No. 101 owner F, 102 owner G, 103 owner H, 201 owner C, 202 owner C, I, 203 owner J, 205 owner J, and 205 owner of the instant apartment house on June 3, 2014.
The company that entered into a standard agreement on joint project for the reconstruction of the instant tenement house is the company that entered into with the division, and the management body composed of all sectional owners of the instant tenement house. The Plaintiff C is elected as the representative of the Plaintiff Blue House Management Body, and the Defendant is 30/172 of each of the real estate listed in the attached Tables 1 and 2 and 105 of the instant tenement house.
(hereinafter “each of the instant real estates”) is the owner of each of the instant real estates.
C. On July 4, 2014, the owner F, 102 owner G, 201 owner C, 202 owner C, 202 owner J, and 203 of the instant tenement house: (a) the owner of the instant apartment house 103 owner H sold the instant apartment house 103 to N, the representative director of the Plaintiff A, on April 13, 2015; and (b) the ownership transfer registration was made in the name of N on April 17, 2015;
The owner L, 205, on July 8, 2014, made a written resolution on reconstruction of the instant tenement house (hereinafter “instant reconstruction resolution”) under the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”), and the main contents of the written resolution are as shown in attached Table 2.
(hereinafter “instant written resolution”). D.
Plaintiff
A Whether or not A has consented to the reconstruction of the instant tenement within two months from the date on which a duplicate of the instant complaint was served to the Defendant through the service of a duplicate of the complaint.