logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.08 2014고정2824
사문서위조등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 12, 2009, at the management office located in Daegu Northern-gu C, the Defendant drafted a public notice stating “(i)” at the request of C’s council of occupants’ representatives D, E, etc., and “public notice to hold a representative meeting of regular occupants: 5 months.”

The Defendant stated the “C Residential Council Chairperson” at the bottom of the foregoing public notice, and affixed a seal on the “C Residential Council Chairperson” kept by the Defendant without permission of F, who was the Chairperson of the C Residential Council at the time of said public notice.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising, forged a public notice of holding the council of occupants' representatives under the name of the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, exercised the foregoing notice as if it was a document duly formed, on the part of the guard-based G, who was aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. A place of business;

1. Court rulings (Tgu District Court Decision 2010Na5797); and

1. Entry of an official announcement (Evidence No. 8) and the application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 200Do1448, Apr. 1, 2007)

1. At the time of the instant case, the head of the headquarters requested the Defendant, who is the head of the management office, to convene a meeting, and the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act and apartment.

arrow