A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2015, the Defendant, who was employed as a delivery employee of a restaurant, stolen a set of food, and stolen it. On December 27, 2015, the Defendant employed the victim D, who was in the Gu, as a delivery employee, to the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D during the Ansan-si period, and then stolen the cash amounting to KRW 400,000 and KRW 1,500,000 in the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment and punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation [the scope of recommendations in the sentencing criteria] - The basic area (from June to June) of types 2 (general larceny) for general property - None of the persons subject to special sentencing [decision of sentence] - No person subject to special sentencing [ there] - The defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant has no record of being punished as a suspended sentence or more; the defendant has no record of being punished as a suspended sentence - Unfavorable circumstances: the defendant has a record of being punished as embezzlement, etc. with cash that the defendant works in the restaurant in the past, has cash that the defendant works in the restaurant, and has a record of being punished as a crime of embezzlement; the victim has not agreed with