logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 12. 23. 선고 2014누59247 판결
시가보다 현저히 낮은 가액으로 주식을 양수한 것에 대한 증여세 과세는 적법함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul Administrative Court 2014Guhap53049 ( October 22, 2014)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2013Do2247 ( December 05, 2013)

Title

Gift tax on the acquisition of shares at a price significantly lower than the market price is legitimate.

Summary

(As in the judgment of the court of first instance, the gift tax on the acquisition of stocks by a person, other than the person in a special relationship, at a price significantly lower than the market price, is lawful in light of the transactional practice, and it cannot be deemed that there is a justifiable reason to exempt additional tax solely on the ground that the existence of the gift interest

Related statutes

Article 35 (Donation, etc. of Profits from Transfer at Low or High Price)

Article 63 (Appraisal of Securities, etc.)

Cases

2014Nu59247

Plaintiff and appellant

IsaA

Defendant, Appellant

head of Sung Dong Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2014Guhap53049 decided July 22, 2014

Conclusion of Pleadings

December 2, 2014

Imposition of Judgment

December 23, 2014

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked, and on October 4, 2012, the Defendant’s gift tax ○○○○○○○ on the Plaintiff.

judgment that revokes the disposition of imposition of the tax

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is that it is the same as the part concerning the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance.

Ro, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

(c)

2. Conclusion

If so, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion shall be decided.

Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow