logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.10.08 2014나12534
부당이득금반환
Text

1. All of the appeal filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff)’s counterclaim claim filed at the trial is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court concerning the plaintiff's claim for judgment on the main claim is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[1] In addition, the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff purchased the instant real estate at KRW 260 million from the Plaintiff on November 13, 2002, and that it paid KRW 260 million to the Plaintiff on KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 for KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,00,00,00.

arrow