Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are members of the D church in the Dong-gu, Daejeon.

1. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant solely committed the Defendant’s crime, on the ground that from the distribution of the second floor of the D church above around 11:00, E starts the representative drawing on the ground that it is not the representative of the members of the said D church, who is the head of the said church, but the representative drawing representing the position of the head of the hall, on the ground that E is not the representative of the members.

The phrase “OUT” and the phrase “satisfibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibibib

“At least 50 times, the representative of the E-ro interfered with towing for about one hour, thereby leading to normal support, as well as interfering with towing for about three times in total, including around 11:00 on August 14, 2016, around 11:0 on August 21, 2016, and around 11:00 on August 21, 2016.

2. B and the Defendant committed the crime with B around 11:00 on August 28, 2016, in collusion with B, the Defendant obstructed the worship by having the E-ro not lead normally, in a way that, from the distribution of the second floor of the D church above, E begins with the representative flag, E begins with the method like the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of each CD-related statute

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 158 (Selection of Penalty) and 158 and 30 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Although the alleged defendant acknowledged the fact that he committed an act identical to the facts constituting an offense, it cannot be recognized that such an act interfered with worship, and the above act of the defendant by the defendant was said to be a religious conscience for the public interest of the church community.