Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. At around December 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed assault, with the influence of alcohol, at the C convenience stores located in Osan-si, 2017, on December 31, 2016, the Defendant obstructed a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by a police officer, by assaulting the slope E, who called the scene to the 112 report of the convenience store employee of the convenience store, to leave the Defendant out of the convenience store.

2. The Defendant of “G” at around 04:15 on January 20, 2017, the Defendant did not pay the alcohol value to the victim H, who is an employee of the said main store, at the main point of “G” located in “G” located in Jeju-si on January 20, 2017.

D. The Defendant 1 and 20-years, i.e., the Defendant 1 and 20-years, i.e., the Defendant 1 and 20-years, i.e., the Defendant 1 and 20-years, i.e., the Defendant 1 and 20-years, i.e., the Defendant 1 and 20-years.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment 1] Facts 1, 2017 order 35]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Notice of 112 Incident report;

1. On-site photographs (the facts listed in Decision 2, the height of 2017, the height of 2178);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to hear statements by a witness H telephone);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances favorable to the defendant in sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows.

The defendant is deeply divided and reflected in each of the crimes in this case.

The defendant seems to have committed each of the crimes in this case in a drunken manner.

The degree of assault against damaged police officers is not much serious.

Defendant shall interfere with his duties.