logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.08.08 2017고단136
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 136"

1. On January 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was at the convenience store “E operated by the victim D located in Busan Sho-gu, Busan, on January 13:00; (b) was at the convenience store of the victim D; and (c) was at the cooling house.

It was difficult to avoid a disturbance between 20 minutes, i.e., "heat, fe. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. c. f. f. f. f. f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

2. On January 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) sought again at the above convenience store around 18:00 on and around January 15, 201; and (b) did not take part in 1,500 won of the market price owned by the said victim in a cooling house.

As a result, the theft was committed.

On November 27, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 03:30 on November 27, 2016, at the “G” restaurant located in Busan-gu, Busan-do; (b) on the ground that the Defendant, who was accumulated on the floor under the influence of alcohol, took a bath for the victim; (c) was able to take a bath for the victim; (d) the Defendant was able to take a bath for the influent customer; (d) the Defendant 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as taking a bath for the influent customer; (e) taking a bath for the influent customer; and (e) taking the other customer to the other customer; and (e) taking a bath for the other customer.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 136"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. 112 Reporting List " 2017 Highest 432";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police of H;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 314(1) and 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel regarding the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order. The Defendant and the defense counsel at the time of each of the instant crimes.

arrow