logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.05.30 2013가단202711
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All claims filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the counterclaim claims filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Determination on the main claim

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s dental license to extract a sacriffly safly safly safly safly on the left side of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant informed the Plaintiff of his safly safly safly safly safly s

Nevertheless, the defendant issued another infant who is next to the plaintiff's request, not the infant that the plaintiff demanded to take steps.

The Plaintiff used only the left part of a baby to spawn or eating. The Defendant was unable to use the left part of the baby due to the Defendant’s misunderstanding of spawn, thereby suffering from a huge mental suffering, such as the increase of food consumption or meal hours by more than four times. As such, the Defendant is obliged to pay 20 million won as consolation money to the Plaintiff.

B. Although there is no dispute between the parties that the Plaintiff visited the Section Division of the Defendant’s operation on November 3, 201 and received the Plaintiff’s extraction of one to the Plaintiff’s left side, it is insufficient to recognize that the entries of the evidence No. 1 through No. 3 alone in the statement of evidence No. 1 to No. 3 have taken place other than the Plaintiff’s to the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim of the principal lawsuit is without merit without need to further examine.

2. Determination on a counterclaim

A. The summary of the defendant's assertion is that the defendant merely derived from the above dental services with the plaintiff's consent, and even if there was no negligence in treating the plaintiff, the plaintiff found the above dental services several times, and before the patient waiting for medical treatment, "this hospital is a dental doctor who misleads the plaintiff," and the defendant tried to spathly gather and assault the nurse as a human being, thereby impairing the defendant's honor, and as such, the defendant interfered with the defendant's three values and operation, the plaintiff is a consolation money for the defendant and the plaintiff's 25 million won.

arrow