logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.12.04 2012고단3105
업무상과실치사
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a dentist who runs a dental clinic from around May 10, 1993.

On November 23, 2011, the Defendant, at the above dental clinic located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, on November 23, 201, 11:30, 201, caused the Victim D (the age of 79 at the time of death) by using the crypt equipment against the Victim D (the age of 79 at the time of death) by neglecting the duty of care of the Victim, thereby damaging the Victim No. 5 by negligence in the course of occupational negligence.

In such a case, a person engaged in dental treatment shall immediately stop the treatment and remove the abandoned infant from the entrance of the victim so that the abandoned infant does not go beyond the victim's food or passage. If the abandoned infant enters the road beyond the victim's timber, it is highly likely that the abandoned infant may inflict bodily harm on the victim's body due to his or her infection, etc., such as the victim's invasion, after a thorough examination of his or her attitude, it is possible to promptly remove the abandoned infant from his or her body condition through the victim's care, so that the abandoned infant can be taken with the victim's internal condition, such as taking the infant's body condition, so that the infant's body condition could not be promptly removed through the victim's internal condition, because it is a senior citizen or that the victim is notified of such symptoms, and thus, it is possible that the abandoned infant might not immediately remove such symptoms from his or her body condition.

However, the Defendant neglected such duty of care and continued to proceed with the 6th Amina in bad faith, even though he did not neglect such duty of care, thereby promptly turning the 5th in bad faith.

arrow