Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 01:05 around 01:05, at the front of the D convenience store located in Sinnam-gun, and (b) 112 reported and sent a bath to the slopeF, etc. of the police box E in the police station, who was not dispatched, and was demanded to return home from the said police officer, and used the said FF’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s flick.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Hearing statements by victimized police officers);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the punishment shall be imposed in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the punishment was imposed on a person who has been committed for a reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but is 17 years prior to the date of the punishment by a fine due to interference with business affairs in 2010, and there is no reason to be punished for a crime until now, and the degree of the assault of this case, the confession of the crime, and the reflection of