logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단3549
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized ID6 (No. 3) was seized from Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

China's name misscisionist (China's name misscising fraud assistance personnel) is a Chinese total responsibility that instructs China and Korea to operate and withdraw a call center, remittance, solicitation and delivery of passbook, etc. Under the condition that he receives 2% of the withdrawn amount, Defendant A collected cash that was withdrawn by the Chinese total responsibility and delivered it to China, and transferred it to the person who received the withdrawal amount. Defendant B, under the condition that he received 3% of the withdrawn amount, withdrawn the money deposited in the passbook and distributed it to Defendant A with the responsibility of withdrawing the money deposited in the passbook. Defendant B, under the condition that he received 3% of the withdrawn amount, made a withdrawal of the money deposited in the passbook, and conspired in order to receive money from many and unspecified domestic unspecified persons by misrepresenting the State agency or financial institution, etc., in order.

According to the above public invitation, on June 12, 2015, at around 09:57, the person whose name was omitted in China called the victim E to the public prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, and falsely assumes the victim as the prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, "whether there is a loss of the resident registration certificate, or whether it is related to the suspect of the scaming case. In principle, the arrest investigation is a principle, and if the special agenda is investigated, it may be investigated without detention, and if the investigation is conducted, it can be conducted without detention, and send money to the investigator to the account in order to verify that there is no risk of escape." The victim transferred KRW 28,670,000 to the account of FF community credit cooperatives (G) around 14:12 of the same day.

Since then, Defendant B, along with the above F, withdrawn KRW 26,670,00 from the Bupyeong Saemaul Depository located in the area near the Bupyeong-gu Seoul metropolitan market No. 4,00, and Defendant A tried to look at around it.

As a result, the Defendants, in collusion with the false names of China, by deceiving the victim, and by receiving 28,670,000 won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. The records of seizure, the list of seizures, the details of transactions, and the dialogues.

arrow