1. The following amount among the parts against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance (appointed parties) shall be ordered to be paid:

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "F" No. 14 of the first instance court's judgment No. 2; "No. 2 of the third instance court's judgment No. 15; "No. 2 of the third instance court's judgment No. 2, No. 6, and No. 7; "No. 5" is as "safety;" "No. 3-c. of the third party;" "No. 17 through No. 8 of the 7 of the 7 of the 17 of the 7 of the 7 of the 8 of the 7 of the 8 of the 7 of the 8 of the 7 of the 7 of the 7 of the 7 of the 7 of the 8 of the 7 of the 7 of the 8 of the 7 of the 7 of the 7 of the 8 of the 20th appeal; the defendant's argument at the trial of the court of the first instance is added to "No. 3.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On the 7th through 8th 5th 17th 5, “The plaintiffs sought payment of KRW 3,00,000,000, respectively, as consolation money for damages caused by the fire of this case. The health unit for the plaintiffs, and the facts that the plaintiffs suffered from serious injury to the plaintiff Gap 2 degree of image due to the fire of this case are as seen earlier. The consolation money shall be determined as KRW 1,00,000,00 in consideration of all the circumstances revealed in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances surrounding the fire of this case, the part and degree of the plaintiff Gap's injury, age, family relation, etc. In addition, the above argument of the plaintiff Gap 2 is reasonable within the above recognition scope. Further, the mental suffering caused by health class and property damage of the plaintiff 2 is serious enough to compensate for damages caused by the fire of this case (the Supreme Court Decision 96Da3810, Jul. 10, 1998).