logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.23 2016고단1131
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for eight months, for Defendant B, and for three million won, for Defendant C.

Defendant

C.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendants, as Defendant B’s business owners, exercise overall control over the operation of sexual traffic establishments, and Defendant A, as the franchisor, reported the business of the massage place in its name, and provided the customers with the massage prior to engaging in sexual traffic. Defendant C, in turn, engaged in the business of sexual traffic establishments by providing the customers with the information on the absence of the Defendant B, or by providing the customers with the information on the guest room.

From November 30, 2015 to December 30, 2015, the Defendants had 14 facilities, such as “E,” from the fourth floor of the D Building in Changwon-si, and arranged commercial sex acts for the business of having female employees, such as F, receive 150,000 won at one time against many unspecified male customers, who had been located there, and let them sexual intercourse with each other, and paying 80,000 won to female employees in return for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. A written statement in F and G preparation;

1. Reporting on detection (a suspected person who violates the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage of sexual traffic);

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (temporary setting of crimes);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of punishment - Defendant A and B: Imprisonment with prison labor - Defendant C: Selection of fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of a workhouse (Defendant C);

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of each of the suspended sentence (Defendant A and B) is as follows: Defendant A [the scope of the recommended punishment] and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the two types of sexual traffic crimes subject to the age of 19 or older, mediation of sexual traffic, etc. (mediation of sexual traffic due to business and payment of consideration, etc.) [the sentence] [the decision of sentence] six months of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution (the process of the crime, details of division of roles, reflects the initial offender, etc.]. Defendant B [the scope of the recommended punishment] of Defendant B

arrow