1. The Defendant: 61,636,390 won to Plaintiff A; 120,882,470 won to Plaintiff B; and 120,882,470 won to Plaintiff B; and each of the above amounts, on December 19, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. Ginam-si took the relocation of the office building as its principal business in order to minimize inconvenience to the residents of new cities while viewing the establishment of a development restriction zone related to the leisure zone. However, the Korea National Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Land Corporation”) was merged with the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009.

In this chapter, only “Defendant” in total shall be deemed to be “Defendant” before and after the merger.

(2) In order to reflect such administrative demand and to meet the government policies, the area of 90,000 square meters, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “the instant leisure zone”) between Sungnam-si and Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-dong, Sungwon-dong, Sungwon-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and the area of 90,000 square meters, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “the instant leisure zone”);

Since then, the area was reduced to 894,000 square meters as the planned area of the national rental housing complex.

(2) On October 9, 2003, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation amended on October 9, 2003, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation amended on the Ministry of Construction and Transportation’s guidelines for formulating an urban management plan (hereinafter “instant development guidelines”) to cancel a development-restricted zone, such as collective settlement, etc. (hereinafter “the development-restricted zone”) includes a content that expands the scope of the preferential cancellation of the development-restricted zone to the medium-scale collective settlement in order to early resolve the inconvenience of residents in relation to the restriction on development in the collective settlement zone.

As a result, collective development in the leisure zone of this case constitutes an area subject to priority cancellation of development restriction zones, but the above area was not implemented with priority cancellation procedure on the ground that it is promoted simultaneously with the designation of an area subject to national rental housing complex and the cancellation of development restriction zones.

3 On January 20, 2006, Sungnam-si designated the instant leisure area to the Defendant as a district for the national rental housing complex.