logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.09.25 2013가단211949 (1)
토지보상금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 79,081,00, and KRW 20,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 52,53,642 from September 17, 2013.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The progress of the development restriction zone related to the instant leisure zone 1) Korea National Housing Corporation (the Korea Land Corporation on October 1, 2009) was merged with the Defendant.

The “Defendant” shall not be deemed to be the subject of the merger before and after the merger.

Around May 2004, the area consisting of a neast-dong, Sungnam-dong, Sungnam-dong, Hawon-dong, Howon-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and a 990,000 square meters, etc. (hereinafter “the instant leisure area”).

(2) On June 26, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation, upon the Defendant’s request, designated the Defendant as a district for national rental housing complex, and accordingly, made a public announcement of the urban management plan to cancel the development restriction zone as to the said district.

3) On the other hand, Sungnam-si prepared a decision to modify an urban management plan in Sungnam-si, which requires the cancellation of a development restriction zone with respect to collective exploitation in the female water zone among other areas and the female water zone in a equitable manner in terms of equity in the female water zone, and completed the internal resolution on June 23, 2006 and intended to take the procedure for public inspection immediately thereafter. However, as seen earlier, on June 26, 2006, no subsequent procedure was conducted for the preferential cancellation of collective exploitation on the wind that the female water zone was designated as the national rental housing complex district as the national rental housing complex district on June 26, 2006, and the area of the land, which was promoted for the preferential cancellation as above, was 100,360 square meters, and the area of the land was 29,292 square meters or less (hereinafter referred to as “the area of the land in this case on June 26, 2012”).

arrow