Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving duty of BCA110V.

On May 2, 2020, the Defendant driven the upper obaon around 18:30 on May 2, 2020, led to the mountain 51 oba-ro 203 oba-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si to the mountain oba-si from the c apartment.

The location is an intersection with signal apparatus installed, and the police officers belonging to D of the Military Police Station of the Military Coast Guard have been working for traffic safety to solve traffic congestion, so there was a duty of care to safely drive a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle according to the traffic signal of the intersection and traffic control of the police.

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant neglected to perform his duties and discovered the Defendant, who was straighted in the fluor E (ma, South, 35 years old) of the Victim Military Police Station, while working for the Defendant, and was in the course of his occupational negligence to load the victim's her lebbbane while driving the lebbane, even though the Defendant was sent back to the fluor of the fluorial fluoral fluor, and was then

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the escape of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu near the five main areas of the Si/Gun/Gu, which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A traffic accident report, a written statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident, and CCTV images at the scene of an accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a medical certificate and photograph list;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant became aware of and avoided the victim when the Defendant got close to the situation, and therefore, the Defendant did not shock the victim's right to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to her to ob.